Chinese immigrants to the US in the and the cross-cultural issues and the challenges

Chinese immigrants to the US in the and the cross-cultural issues and the challenges

Research Question: Challenges to Chinese Immigration and Assimilation

Topic statement: Cross-cultural problems and difficulties faced by Chinese immigrants in the United States

References page

• Lew-Williams, B. (2018). The Chinese must go: Violence, exclusion, and the making of the alien in America. Harvard University Press.
• Young, J. G. (2017). Making America 1920 again? Nativism and US immigration, past and present. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5(1), 217-235.
• Chen, J. (2019). The Chinese of America. Plunkett Lake Press.
• Price, P. J. (2018). A “Chinese Wall” at the Nation’s Borders: Justice Stephen Field and The Chinese Exclusion Case. J. SUP. CT. HIST., 43, 7-13.
• Lee, E. (2019). America for Americans: A history of xenophobia in the United States. Basic Books.

An emphasis is placed on the ethnic-cultural issue, leading the discernment towards the identification of mechanisms and operational strategies that can contribute to the incorporation of the intercultural approach in social policy. multiculturalism and assimilation have been coined in recent years to refer to cultural diversity. It is not enough to accommodate the other; living together necessitates the creation of an institutional structure capable of incorporating all, as well as individual and collective life plans that involve "the diverse" and allow for the development of individual identities and collectives based on a universality that is universal (Li, 1991). The purpose of this article is to reflect on this relationship between culture and social policy within the framework of the conception of human Immigration with special focus on. 

Cross-cultural issues and the challenges have been enhanced around the world as a result of improved connectivity, owing primarily to the network's position, the expansion of commercial exchange, and the intensity of migratory flows. It has also seen the most remarkable market growth and deepening since capitalism's birth, culminating in negative globalization (Lee & Zhao, 2003) Faced with this, “positive globalization” has arisen, arising from the rise of a global social movement, global normative structures in support of human rights, and debates that have sought to deepen the character of knowledge and culture at the same level. Many of these categories, such as hygiene habits, vaccination, and basic schooling, are implicit in some countries where social policy has been well established, and have been properly internalized and accepted as something common in people and institutions for a long time. spanning many generations and becoming part of a broader national cultural trend in other countries or territories, there has been no change in institutional and social “internalization” of these essential life parameters. While this is a weakness reflected in unfavorable social metrics, it also represents an opportunity, as revised trends will emerge that integrate diversity and identify intelligent structures to guide redevelopment. The community is very important in Chinese culture, while the member is very important in American culture. Individuals can shine in the United States, while in China, any success is regarded as a success for the business, the family, or the team. Rather than looking out only for themselves, a Chinese individual may consider how their behavior will influence the community as a whole. Symbols, vocabulary, customs, beliefs, and objects are the main components of culture.

Language promotes meaningful social contact and forms people's perceptions of concepts and objects (Paul, 2009). Individualism, competitiveness, and a commitment to the work ethic are among the main values that characterize the United States. The community is very important in Chinese culture, while the member is very important in American culture. Individuals can shine in the United States, while in China, any success is regarded as a success for the business, the family, or the team. Rather than looking out only for themselves, a Chinese individual may consider how their behavior will influence the community as a whole. At a macro level, that is, at the level of action structures, culture resurfaces as an integral component for Parsons. Other systems of action, like the cultural framework, structure the context in which social systems emerge (Anderson & Blayer, 2005). The boundaries of social structures are described in terms of their reciprocal relationships with the organism, actions, individual personality, and cultural systems. The main criticism of this classic answer to the problem of double contingency is that it places an undue normative emphasis on the social dimension, i.e., the formation of a consensus. The double contingency problem, on the other hand, can be solved in other dimensions, such as by a series of arbitrary events on a time horizon. 

As a result, while the likelihood of a cultural orientation in concrete interaction situations is entirely possible, cultural convergence appears as one choice among many, not as an unavoidable rule (Hiromi, 2010). Culture can be interpreted in this way by looking at its own susceptibility to selections, or contingency. Culture addresses the issue of "interdependence of perceptions" or "double contingency between Alter and Ego" at the level of basic experiences, and it retains patterns and evaluative orientations at the level of more complex systems: Culture offers standards value orientations that are implemented in evaluative processes in these basic social interactions, as well as in large-scale social structures. Human personalities and social structures would not be possible without culture. 

A culture assimilation must be able to account for its own operability in society, like its ability to replicate and interact. Neither the anthropological theories of culture, which attempted to encompass the entire human phenomenon, nor the theories that distinguish between the two, have been successful. 



Challenges to Chinese Immigration and Assimilation

References

• Lew-Williams, B. (2018). The Chinese must go: Violence, exclusion, and the making of the alien in America. Harvard University Press.
• Young, J. G. (2017). Making America 1920 again? Nativism and US immigration, past and present. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5(1), 217-235.
• Chen, J. (2019). The Chinese of America. Plunkett Lake Press.
• Price, P. J. (2018). A “Chinese Wall” at the Nation’s Borders: Justice Stephen Field and The Chinese Exclusion Case. J. SUP. CT. HIST., 43, 7-13.
• Lee, E. (2019). America for Americans: A history of xenophobia in the United States. Basic Books.