A Crisis of Governance: State Government Shutdowns

The government shutdown is a critical process. It is a phenomenon when the government fails to pass funding legislation to finance the next expenditure and causes a full or partial shutdown of federal government operations and its agencies (Brass, 2013). In the time of a shutdown whether it is a Federal or State it is a general trend in the United States that non-essential government workers cease their operations. It is caused by budget disputes as well as a lack of political stalemates.

There are many consequences of a government shutdown, such as the fact that federal employee operations are paused, including national parks, museums, and the processing of certain applications (Nagel & Murray, 2013). The economic impact of the shutdowns includes postponed government contracts, lower consumer spending by furloughed workers, and financial market disruptions. In history, there have been various lengths of government shutdowns, from a few days to several weeks.

Introduction

Whenever there is a government shutdown, it is a fundamental breakdown in the political process. The increased polarization and fiscal constraints of modern governance raise many challenges. The political parties are not able to come together in a single declaration. This paper will analyze Michigan's recent experiences with state government shutdowns. In the process of this examination, the paper will also compare other states' shutdowns to highlight the challenges.

State Government Shutdowns: Michigan's 2019 Budget Impasse

In 2019, Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer and the Republican-controlled legislature disagreed, causing government shutdowns. Their disagreements were on road funding, education spending, and environmental initiatives (Michigan Gov. Whitmer signs state budget hours before deadline, 2019). This not only divided the government but also highlighted the broader challenges facing states.

The state legislature and the governor of Michigan disagreed over the state budget, which led to the 2019 government shutdown. Republican lawmakers in control of the state legislature opposed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's proposed tax increases to pay for upgrades to public services and infrastructure (Michigan budget analysis: Spending up $1.7B, but roads, higher ed cut, 2019). A budget impasse caused by this disagreement resulted in a brief partial government shutdown in October 2019.

The lingering tensions were left The last-minute resolution of 2019. Michigan had previously experienced a brief shutdown in 2007, so it is clear that the government of Michigan shows a recurring pattern of budget-related conflicts. In the case of 2019, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, state Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, and House Speaker Lee Chatfield have not reached an agreement on budget negotiations (State Executive Budget, 2017). In the later part, Shirkey insists she permanently renounces this power to limit some of her transfer powers in the current supplemental spending bill.

2020-2021 Development

After the outbreak of the pandemic, Michigan's fiscal landscape in 2020 and 2021 dramatically altered (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020). For the coordinated response of the pandemic, the overall cost of the government. The budget allocation is still being debated. On the other hand, balancing pandemic-related needs is another challenge with ongoing priorities and managing revenue shortfalls.

In the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 the tax structure was continuously changing. In Michigan, tax and contribution evasion were estimated to be worth 83.6 billion dollars in 2021 (Horner & Ivacko, 2021). 10.4 billion are overdue contributions, and 73.2 billion are lost tax receipts. There was a drop of 2.7 billion (-3.1%) from 2020. Between 2016 and 2021, there was a 23.6 billion reduction in the "tax gap" overall. Compared to 2020, there was an approximate 101 million increase from self-employment and business work. 2 billion increase in evasion; beside that, Rentals, Imu, and IRES saw only slight changes, but VAT evasion fell by 3.9 billion. The amount of excise taxes rose by $31 million.

The shadow economy in Michigan rose to $173.9 billion in 2021 (Marshall et al., 2023). In that shadow economy, there is an under-declaration of added value and the use of irregular labor.

State vs. Federal Shutdowns

The cause of the shutdown is the budget agreement. Both federal and state government shutdowns. In the case of state shutdowns, the economic impact may be geographically confined but can still be deeply disruptive. The impact of this shutdown hampers the size and economic structure of the state. On the other hand, in the case of federal shutdowns, national parks, air traffic control, and other critical services that affect people across the country may be impacted.

Handling the shutdown for the federal government is significantly easier than for state governments. The federal government can issue debt (borrow money) and print currency to meet its obligations. But the state government has to rely on taxes, fees, and federal grants. So that they become more vulnerable to economic downturns and less able to weather budget shortfalls.

Compared to state shutdowns, federal shutdowns tend to be longer. At the federal level, more complex political dynamics work. Federal and state governments essential services are not similar. For example, public education is one of the essential needs of the state government; on the other hand, national defense is considered an essential service at the federal level.

Comparing Shutdowns Across the Nation

To give a broader perspective on state government shutdowns, a more detailed examination of these state experiences is discussed below.

From July 1 to July 3, 2017 The New Jersey shutdown lasted because of the debate over the state's largest health insurer, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield (After a day of recriminations, N.J. budget impasse, shutdown continue, 2017). A Republican demanded more control over Horizon's reserves.

From July 1 to July 3, 2017, Maine's shutdown affected about 9,000 state employees and closed various state offices. When the state government made a decision on a 3% surcharge on high-income earners for education, Governor Paul LePage opposed it. This case shows the challenges of implementing tax increases.

Since the Great Depression, Illinois has suffered a two-year budget impasse. the Democratic-controlled legislature and the Republican Governor Bruce Rauner standoff of pro-business reforms and spending cuts vs. protecting social services and raising taxes. The two-year-long crisis had severe consequences as it was the longest of its kind. The consequences include funding cuts or delays for many social service agencies and educational institutions. The credit rating was downgraded, unpaid bills grew to over $14 billion, and there is severe financial strain faced by public universities.

From July 1 to July 20, 2011, the Minnesota shutdown lasted (Minnesota Shutdown Hits Vulnerable First, 2011). The Democratic Governor and the Republican-controlled legislature were divided on how to address a $5 billion budget deficit. The proposal of tax increases versus spending cuts was the issue of the dispute. Significant economic consequences were caused by the prolonged shutdown of tourism to state-run operations. Income revenue was stopped, and the impasse caused significant harm to the state's fiscal health and social service infrastructure.

In 2017, Alaska narrowly avoided a shutdown due to disagreements over addressing the state's fiscal crisis. Similarly in Connecticut (near-shutdown in 2017) and Pennsylvania (2015-2016) on education funding, pension reform, and property tax relief.

The observation and analysis show that structural budget deficits affect the role and size of government, executive and legislative branches, tensions, interest groups, and constituents in terms of state revenues and spending needs (Tools for State and Local Fiscal Management, 2021). while each shutdown has unique local factors like fiscal stress, political polarization, and governance challenges. It seems that the need for improved budget processes, long-term fiscal planning, and mechanisms to encourage compromise in state governments across the country is necessary to overcome these situations.

The Impacts of Government Shutdowns

The impacts of government shutdowns are profound and far-reaching. There are many sectors that are directly impacted by the negative effects of shutdown, whether they are federal or state. For better governance approaches, continuous and steady vital services are necessary. But for the shutdown, these services are interrupted and most vulnerable and dependent on government assistance. hardship for citizens is created by the negative consequences of government shutdowns.

The shutdown impacts everything from food assistance and housing support to veterans' services and national park access. Therefore, the shutdown puts health and safety at risk. The most important issue of the shutdown is keeping the government operational.

The economic costs of shutdowns are also significant. Financial hardships are faced by government employees as well as by government contracts or services that suffer losses. As consumer spending declines and uncertainty increases with the duration of the shutdown, the economy becomes weaker.

To solve the issue of shutdown, three things are necessary: open communication, bipartisan cooperation, and long-term solutions (Economic Implications, 2014). As part of the political process, the shutdown represents an inability to find common ground and prioritize the public good over partisan interests. In budget negotiations, transparency and clear messaging help build understanding. Fostering a political culture that values compromise and finding common ground is most important.

Conclusion

In the previous discussion, it was found that a lack of bipartisan cooperation makes difficult concessions for the greater good. Sustainable, long-term fiscal planning is necessary for addressing structural deficits, reforming budget processes, and investing in areas that promote long-term economic growth and stability. In conclusion, avoiding shutdowns requires a commitment from elected officials, prioritizing open dialogue, fostering a spirit of bipartisanship, and focusing on sustainable solutions.

References

Fitzpatrick, N., Horner, D., & Ivacko, T. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic sparks Michigan local leaders' concerns for fiscal health. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3942870

GIAMBUSSO, D. (2017). After a day of recriminations, N.J. budget impasse, shutdown continue. https://www.politico.com/states/new-jersey/story/2017/07/01/after-a-day-of-recrimination-trenton-no-closer-to-opening-the-government-113189

Horner, D., & Ivacko, T. M. (2021). Michigan Local Government Officials Report Improved Fiscal Health after a Year of COVID-19, but not Yet Back to Pre-Pandemic Levels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3991163

McAsey, J. (2017, July 20). New Jersey Public Employees Stop State Shutdown. Labor Notes. https://www.labornotes.org/2017/07/new-jersey-public-employees-stop-state-shutdown

NJ.com. (2017, July 9). A shutdown over Horizon? "Absurd" | The Auditor. Nj. https://www.nj.com/politics/2017/07/a_shutdown_over_horizon_seemed_absurd_until_it_was.html

Silcox, C., Zimlichmann, E., Huber, K., Rowen, N., Saunders, R., McClellan, M., Kahn, C. N., Salzberg, C. A., & Bates, D. W. (2024). The potential for artificial intelligence to transform healthcare: perspectives from international health leaders. Npj Digital Medicine, 7(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01097-6

Sophie Isabelle Lambert, Madi, M., Sasa Sopka, Lenes, A., Stange, H., Claus-Peter Buszello, & Stephan, A. (2023). An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00852-5

Thayer, C. (2021). Tools for State and Local Fiscal Management. Edward Elgar Publishing EBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886414

US Shutdown: Economic Implications. (2014, January 26). SlideShare. https://www.slideshare.net/ab_gaurav/us-shutdown-economic-implications