Transforming Healthcare: The Key to Improved Patient Care and Value for Money

Introduction

Improving the health care system is dependent on a variety of variables, in particular on value for money. The aim for integrated healthcare system is simple: to enhance the quality of treatment and to decrease waste, to improve the experience of the patient. All the parties gain from this model. Quality and the opportunity to reduce care risks are granted to caregivers. For physicians, hospitals and providers of healthcare, there is an opportunity to remove bottlenecks, save costs and improve efficiency. A health and patient overview Over the years, the behaviour of consumers has evolved. Easy access to information has enhanced people's demands and rights. He is likewise influenced by this shift in position. In my journey of providing health care, I have gain some experience sometimes it was easy sometimes it was difficult to provide personalized healthcare to the patients.   

Healthcare system improvement

Integrated healthcare system

Quality patient care

Reduce care risks

Cost-saving healthcare

Efficient healthcare

Consumer healthcare demands

Personalized healthcare

Enhancing patient experience

Value-based healthcare

Question 1

Using specific examples from own practice to support your discussion, make a case for why care settings must achieve the best possible outcome for users off service in their care.

The consequence is devotion to medical experts and organizations and the creation of value-added initiatives. So waste is also minimized in health management, which is crucial. Efficiency and the implementation of excellent practice in clinical management are all involved.

In order to meet professional goals, the notion of group effort is important. With the creation of a professional organization, professional professionals are convinced that the profession and services of their members may be enhanced instead of by individual efforts. Although nurses have been involved collectively for many years in certain sectors, such as the development for study programs of specific provisions and awards of diplomas, measures aimed at their economic and social well-being were not, instead, of equal interest. This negligence contributed directly to the preservation of terrible working conditions, low salaries and bad conditions. This negligence immediately has led to the continued dearth of nurses and to the difficulties of attracting qualified candidates and maintaining them in the profession. These have led directly to uncomfortable working environments, low salaries and poor job performances. The absence of competent and reliable nursing workers in turn adds to patient care being inadequate in many situations (Albarrak et al. 2018a). The case for this stance is that if the professional expertise is indeed so specialized, no one can define a safe and successful professional practice better than themselves (Albarrak et al. 2018a). A person without exceptional understanding of a certain subject is not the most appropriate. A person with no specific understanding of a certain field is not the greatest way to judge how such information is to be employed. This is the basis on which the concept that professionals must have the necessary authority to control the exercise of their profession is based (David et al. 2013). A person with no specific understanding of a certain field is not the greatest way to judge how such information is to be employed. This is how the notion of the required authority for professionals to govern the practice is built. This is the cornerstone of the concept (Albarrak et al. 2018). Then we discuss professionalism and the way in which nurses took part.

A person without the unique understanding of a certain field is not best prepared to decide on the application of that information (Albarrak et al. 2018). This is the premise on which the notion is founded on which professionals have the power to manage their career. Although the profession provides standards and guidance on how the job should be conducted, one occupation does not have to oversee another, save during a time of training. Professional consultants advise and consult colleagues, but the professionals who have produced it are responsible for decision-making (Albarrak et al. 2018). The application of the specialist methods professional judgment. Professional judgment is making the optimal option in order to apply it to a certain scenario using the specific information you have. Knowledge is the basis of the professional model, giving the members the power to decide on the execution of their profession. We'll discuss the notion of professionalism and the way in which caregivers have participated while neglecting other parts of the profession that are damaging to nursing (Albarrak et al. 2018). Lastly, we will propose the concept of communal professional work as a suggestion of prospective nurses' attitudes (Thomas et al. 2019).  Albeit in elements such as which duties the infant does, who does what, minimum level of education, etc., the structure of nursing divides between nations as to the core activities of the infirm, worldwide homogeneity exists. In general, these functions include promoting and restoring health, illness prevention and sickness treatment (RumballSmith et al. 2014). Although some of these duties are also the duty of others, the nurses supplied the ill with the required care (Srivastava, Kahan & Nader 2017). In this way, nursing knowledge may be seen as the science of health care. In this way, the nursing knowledge may be regarded as a care science, just as the healing science is typical of medicine. The healing science involves the diagnosis and treatment of disease, which is a recognized field of the doctor. The science of care concentrates, on the other hand, on the knowledge necessary for caring for the sick, which includes comfort, relief of pain and other unpleasant sensations, the establishment of favourable sleep and relaxation conditions, minimization of the problems caused through hospitalizations that help the patient cope with his diseases (Albarrak et al. 2018). Although certain nursing tasks are directly linked to the treatment. While certain nursing actions are directly associated with treatment by the doctor and directed at the treatment of the disease and part of the physician's work includes components of the care of the sick, both areas of care and healing generally are connected to the caregiver and the physician (Smith et al. 2017). Care and healing duties are complimentary as health is both essential and valuable. Nursing as well as medicine are interested in various areas of health care, such as promotion of health and prevention of diseases; nonetheless, the principal healthcare and healing activities are appropriate for nurses and physicians.

Combining hard labour with a focus on sacrifice and obedience has made the care of the child desirable, but not as a generally attractive career (Pendharkar et al. 2021). Nearly every country in the world today faces the lack of skilled nurses. The problem is that applicants are recruited and that the profession leaves. Furthermore, caregivers who are ready for first-class professional service often do not have enough time to devote themselves to direct patient care and must devote themselves instead to the education and supervision of individuals with less preparation or the co-ordination of their actions. The fact that the finest skilled and competent caregivers in taking care of the sick are the first to take on other jobs is well known for a long time. This leaves patients with incomplete or improvised formation in the hands of others. Another negative effect of the lack of trained nurses is that competent people do not have sufficient time to improve the overall level of knowledge in the nursing industry, because they are involved in the training of other nurses (Langton et al. 2016). Many contributions to professional science are still in their infancy, mostly because only a tiny number of nurses have paid attention and efforts. Instead of using active research initiatives to develop new work techniques, nurses have had to rely upon what is known and acquired from other occupations (Pastori et al. 2019a). The underdevelopment of nursing skills in relieving pain, increasing patient comfort, promoting relaxation and sleep, education of patients of all health and diseases, and other issues of all sorts (Langton et al. 2016a). When new information is included in the curriculum, it is usually often medical and other parallel disciplines that contribute to raise the quality of their profession, rather than the contemplation and experimenting of the nurses themselves (Khanassov et al. 2016a). 

Capacity utilization is the emphasis of outcome-based healthcare services. The quality of the clinical results is therefore assessed in proportion to their cost. For the computation the formula used is:

Value = results of care / expenses of care

The aim is to ensure a satisfactory result that shows efficiency and waste reduction. Thus, the quality of care and safety may be offered to the patient by placing him in the focus of attention. It is the notion to rely on the commitment of the patient for prognosis and therapy. It therefore satisfies the above-mentioned behavioural changes.

How did I implement outcome-based healthcare system?

An efficient analysis of health information depends on the implementation of the value-based health paradigm. In order to gather and handle the information, I had to use the technology.

The platform enables: quality care and economic information to be captured; information to be used with the help of artificial intelligence; care to be taken and predictions of the economy; decisions taken on the basis of insights gained from this instrument; value to be delivered using all of the resources mentioned above.

Benefits of outcome-based healthcare system?

Both the health care operators and patients receive advantages that are validated through value-based healthcare management. This is because the treatment of the patient is concentrated. The advantages generated are generally:

Building a sustainable future by implementing the proposed new value-adding aid and payment methods;

Apply value-based clinical management in order to enhance care results and decrease waste;

Hospital efficiency, resource optimization and enhanced bed usage;

Patient discharge safety to decrease mortality and rates of readmission;

Reduction of unnecessary primary care admissions;

Surgical ambulatory patients' ability to contribute to safety

In order to complicate the existing scenario, population demand for health services in many nations has risen, with the gap between the kind of healthcare and the type of treatment requested (Hsu et al. 2017). The population needs for healthcare services have risen in many nations to complicate the existing scenario, which every day shows the gap between the sort of treatment wanted and that which is already given.

Question 2

It means that these services are historically not aimed at perfection, but at quality and quality, and are seen by the user as being no longer only a question of technical or inherent quality (Grandes et al. 2017a). Health actions are generally framed by four words: fairness, efficiency, efficiency and efficiency. The supply of services must be done equally, in other words to provide accessibility for those who need it most; to ensure efficiency, i.e., methods and suitable technology; to accomplish adequate cover and impact with efficiency and match performance and costs. However, it is necessary to take account of some important aspects concerning the term quality. Firstly, quality does not mean luxury or complexity, but must be the same at every level of care, on the contrary (Foo, Chuan De et al. 2021). Secondly, it is not an absolute phrase, but an ongoing process of improvement. Thirdly, the quality is objective and quantifiable. Finally, not one group but the whole company (David et al. 2013). It does not depend on a group of people. The difficulty is to assess the entire process so that it can be objective and compared, allowing standards to be defined and remedial processes to be developed continuously.  First of all, we need to realize that it is the dawn of our knowledge of the quality, the purpose and the purpose of it. Furthermore, as an organization, we need to realize that working with quality makes our work easy, reducing the probability of failures and increasing the safety and efficiency of patients. In our field of labour, our acknowledgment of peers and our work team will also improve treatment, enhancing our self-esteem and making it a virtuous loop. In fact, we can improve treatment. This indicates that our acts are part of a continual improvement work circuit (Dreier Wolfgramm et al. 2017). 

Quality with an emphasis on the patient: the patient and his family need to be completely addressed.

Focus on improved processes: processes may be better managed by recognizing patient requirements, based on what the population needs. As more than one individual engages in the processes, the team involved must be committed to each of them (Deakin et al. 2005).

continual improvements always as a goal: to constantly and regularly set short, medium and long-term targets, so that the proactivity of internal users may always be reviewed and measurement formats produced as indicators that enable us to see continuous progress in the quality.

Recognition of consolidating achievements: you must promote, recognize results, emphasize whether a job is carried out effectively, identify who did it and determine who has done it. This system leads to the establishment of the centre's "brand."

Monitoring outcomes: procedures may be improved by measuring results, including assessing indicators of mortality, illness, birth rate. If cannot check them and act, there is nothing to get away from having indicators.  Measuring processes: protocol compliance.  Patients' and their families' satisfaction measurements: evaluate how pleased users are with our job, treatments and ultimate results by means of indicators (Albarrak et al. 2018).

However, every effort should be made to standardize procedures, accreditation services and to how things are done. These technologies will help improve the quality of user care and reduce clinical and administrative mistakes, enabling better management (Budrevičiūtė, Kalėdienė & Petrauskienė 2018).

The major objective is to offer patients and their families with services. The world and the people are changing and we need to start and work with excellence. This process generates a virtuous circle in the organization, since quality teamwork, decisions and actions benefit all. The big task is to create a new culture, a shift in ordinary labor (DreierWolfgramm et al. 2017a). We can decrease cost, not only financial expenses, but also time, human, physical and appliance resources and acquire more resources to be invested in additional advantages by optimizing processes and doing our task with quality. It therefore offers medical practitioners the tools to enhance their therapeutic treatments continually (Athilingam & Jenkins 2018).

The structured planning and development systems should, however, be implemented in line with total quality criteria (Askew et al. 2020).There are compelling reasons for the services now in place to adopt this approach, including scientifically unjustified function and outcome variability, the apparent competitive tendency among clinical units, and rising expectations by users and health authorities. In the meantime, the key reason should not be forgotten: professional morale, which forces us to provide the best of our patients (Takeda et al. 2019). Adequate quality-assurance program is based on the fundamental conditions of: firm support of the hospital directorate and the heads of the surgery, basic training and quality management assessment, active involvement of personnel, access to adequate and reliable process information and encouragement of staff (recognition, additional remuneration, further training, promotion, etc.). In order to develop a quality assurance program, a number of phases are needed which can be summarized. To develop a program for quality assurance, the main steps are to be taken: the setting up of a Quality Service Management Group, the formation of Quality Improvement Teams for each process, the surveillance of indicators and activities and the evaluation of the Program by participating staff members (David et al. 2013).

The moral commitment to seek the best for the patient, the fact that medical organizations should become services companies and the need to limit increasing health care expenses (RumballSmith et al. 2014). 

Several theories are aimed at explaining motive, but Frederick Herzberg's theory of two factors tackles two separate phenomena as the issue of pleasure and motivation in the workplace. For them, job pleasure alone is not able to influence the behavior of an employee permanently; on the other hand, while present, it makes you more equilibrated, productive and willing to accomplish more and better. Motivation is regarded as one of the key elements in relation to productivity and quality at work in the present organizational setting, especially since institutions are increasingly aware that the competitive difference comes largely from the people involved. An misunderstanding about how to promote motivation in the workplace, however, leads to motivational programs that are aimed solely at shaping the worker' s behaviors and ensuring that the organization's subordinate conduct takes place

Maslow's renowned Pyramid is the outcome of one of the most famous studies in which he outlines the effect of every human need on his motivation. The fundamental physiological requirements of people and, above all, of 'personal satisfaction' are at the base of Maslow's pyramid, a point where people feel their achievements fulfilled over their lives. Frederick Irving Herzberg was both a psychologist and an important professor of North American corporate management who has examined and demonstrated through several practical studies the presence of two factors which need to be considered for job satisfaction: salary, corporate policies, opportunities for growth, superior relations with others, social factors. In practice, these academics' theories allow us to unravel. In practice, the ideas of these individuals allow us to better understand each person's behavior inside an institution and are also the cornerstones of the behavioral management theory, which aims at developing high performance teams using strategies and tools. Behavioral management must be used to understand the workers' skills, potential and chances for growth from an analysis in a vocational program through the ongoing development of the individual inside the institution. The profile that meets the requirements of the Organization is important to identify. Many institutions, especially those aimed at success and development, choose to succeed. Most Institutions, particularly those aimed at growth, choose to attract, create charismatic leaders who, by bringing the team closer together, establish an organizational culture and ultimately receive more acceptance and appreciation from their team members. In the face of so many research on the behavior of men and women it is true that a professional with higher empathy, capacity to understand and respond to human needs, who build strong incentive and feedback strategies for his team, becomes an appreciated leader and a respected one.

At present there is a trend towards gradual comparability. There is a tendency to gradually compare the different centers. Nowadays, the clinical units' service portfolios represent the connection of a number of operations. However, it is highly possible that in the near future indicators of results will also be included in these services, so that these services can be contracted. On the other hand, the information provided will be decisive when a patient or a company has the power to select. Appropriate quality management program will also offer the information essential to define the service portfolio, another key component of managing quality (Albarrak et al. 2018). Similarly, a sufficient quality management program will be necessary to define a portfolio of services, as well as the promotion of the collaborative involvement of professionals that constitute the various units or services of the hospital. Another essential element of the quality management programmers (Sturgiss et al. 2018b). the percentage of patients with an operational booster dosage and the percentage of patients with entire protocol dose). The word standard refers to the degree of conformity needed by criteria 36 and it is defined as an acceptable range of quality. Since the minimal level establishes that quality would be impaired, it may also be understood in each circumstance as the set of diagnostic and treatment maneuvers (Smith et al. 2017). 

Question 3

In terms of the quality function and the QMS supporting it several decades ago, at the beginning of the movement for Total Quality Management, any function of importance for a company had to appear on the organization chart. 

Previous considerations of the assessment functions have led to the conclusion that assessment serves the teaching process and does not vice versa and to changes to traditional approaches regarding participants' positions in the learning process, as well as the relationship between the evaluator-evaluated cooperation or collaboration in order to achieve this objective. The evaluation findings are interpreted from being static data and therefore readily extended to being regarded for another moment of QMS as general judgements about the student's competence or value. The assessment processes and means might be termed an error. The standard based reference system favours the collection of standard evaluation subject-matter indicators, common to all individuals who have been evaluated, so that it allows to define each individual's relative position in relation to the central population tendency measurements that it serves as the reference. To this aim, the use of tests, in terms of their content and shape equal, unifies the test scenario in order to determine the criteria and to compare the individual accomplishments; this increases the significance of the examination in the area of assessment (Rumball Smith et al. 2014).

Progress was made before the National Campaign for Quality Health Services, but mainly from the latter, and in this direction, during and beyond its milestone. The current situation is very variable between states, in relation to their hierarchical levels, but there are all organizational ups and downs; the public system of the Ministry of Health is at least one that is highly variable. Quality managers and specialist committees at different levels of the system responsible for quality and safety, at least theoretically (Rumball Smith et al. 2014). In the central organization chart, the quality function, with hierarchical differences in recent years, is also visible. Structural development was however not accompanied by a simultaneous development of training and professionalism of the people responsible for these responsibilities so as to recognize this deficit as an absence and as a consequential priority action by the professionals in these jobs in order to improve their health services (Athilingam & Jenkins 2018). Improvement in quality needs all levels of synergistic competition. However, given that medicine and clinical care, in a wide sense, hold a prominent role in the system, it is desirable to provide a chance for medical graduates to develop their theoretical and practical understanding of quality management as an area. of specialty. This training should encourage people to take positions of leadership in healthcare institutions and other occupations within quality structures that are crucial for or at least reasonably distinguish between medical science, language and principles (Al-Khaldi, Khan & Khairallah 2002). The combination of medical education and excellent health care management may be the most desirable in many instances (Al-Khaldi, Khan & Khairallah 2002). This notion has been developed for years and warrants specific training for excellent clinicians. The growing complexity of medical treatment has led in the necessity for specialized training in several disciplines and sub-disciplines that are necessary for proper profound and competent clinical attention (Srivastava, Kahan & Nader 2017; Smith et al. 2017). This evolution was not foreign to the area of quality improvement, and although its methodological principles may be called generic, their effective implementation needs ever more profound and particular understanding of the clinical environments under which they need to be applied. The current tendency to assure clinical use in nations such as the UK (Thomas et al. 2019). The current tendency in nations such as the UK for ensuring that clinical quality improvement initiatives are driven by the department, healthcare professionals, in any department or department (Takeda et al. 2019; RumballSmith et al. 2014). The notion of quality and its continual improvement at each stage of the health system is also connected with an express desire to take responsibility for it. For any health system, too, the job that these professionals may do from scientific societies and in conjunction with other health specializations and services in their clinical fields. There's no greater quality awareness and leadership than the people themselves; the individual and complicated issues of each discipline and specialized healthcare sector will never be considered foreign to them (Sturgiss et al. 2018). Candidates for this subspecialty are, naturally, physicians of any other clinical speciality, which must focus on the implementation of continuous quality improvement concepts and methodologies in that particular clinical field. The transversality of these concepts and techniques means that, if you are looking for a larger training, other theoretical-practical modules can complete this speciality to certify the degree (Srivastava, Kahan & Nader 2017). Improving quality requires synergistic competition of all levels of responsibility, as well as awareness and basic training for health service providers, without overlooking the fact that the main service is clinical services in the broad sense, and leadership, its understanding and practice have specific characteristics that professionals are able to better carry out with them. All health professions and those within the sphere of growth in the healthcare sector are relevant to the system's optimal functioning (Thomas et al. 2019) . Continuous quality improvement training is an essential complement to any other efforts that may be initiated, even if carried out independently (Hsu et al. 2017). It could consist in specific courses on three activities or paths to continuous improvement (monitoring, improvement cycles and planning); on the other hand, specific issues of particular interest or importance, for example the building and implementation of clinical pathways, healthcare communication, qualitative resource management. The instrument's overvaluation implies its results, Assessment by and by goals originates in the paradigm for the evaluation of learning which is still prominent. It also involves relying on the learned goods to appreciate them, but indicates major distinctions in relation to the basic performance or material achievement mentioned above. It highlights the non-spontaneous, but proactive, guided and guided characteristic of the learning that takes place in a framework of the subjects that are reflected in the objectives of the learning. This assessment is not enough, however, because it disregards the learning process

Conclusion

This posture shift also affects health care. If doctors were the only informants up until some years ago, patients now are discussing methods and wanting to become more involved. This circumstance provides benefits and problems. Firstly, the healthcare practitioner must show why a specific choice has been reached. The patient, on the other hand, wants to take part and be involved, increasing the odds that he is following the treatment plan and obtaining positive outcomes. It is here that health is value-based. When doctors, hospitals and operators adopt this behavioural adjustment and focus on care quality, patients feel the difference and improve their performance.



Reference list

1. 
   
2. Al-Khaldi, YM, Khan, MY & Khairallah, SH 2002, ‘Audit of referral of diabetic patients’, Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177–181, viewed 23 June 2021, <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11938394>.
3. Albarrak, AI, Mohammed, R, Assery, B, Allam, D, Morit, SA, Saleh, Reem Al & Zare’a, R 2018a, ‘Evaluation of diabetes care management in primary clinics based on the guidelines of American Diabetes Association’, International journal of health sciences, vol. 12, Qassim Uninversity, no. 1, pp. 40–44.
4. ― 2018b, ‘Evaluation of diabetes care management in primary clinics based on the guidelines of American Diabetes Association’, International journal of health sciences, vol. 12, Qassim Uninversity, no. 1, pp. 40–44.
5. Askew, DA, Togni, SJ, Egert, S, Rogers, L, Potter, N, Hayman, NE, Cass, A, Alex & Schluter, PJ 2020, ‘Quantitative evaluation of an outreach case management model of care for urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults living with complex chronic disease: a longitudinal study’, BMC health services research, vol. 20, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 917–917.
6. Athilingam, P & Jenkins, B 2018, ‘Mobile Phone Apps to Support Heart Failure Self-Care Management: Integrative Review’, JMIR Cardio, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e10057.
7. Barbazza, E, Kringos, D, Kruse, I, Klazinga, Niek S & Tello, JE 2019, ‘Creating performance intelligence for primary health care strengthening in Europe’, BMC health services research, vol. 19, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 1006–1006.
8. Budrevičiūtė, A, Kalėdienė, R & Petrauskienė, J 2018, ‘Priorities in effective management of primary health care institutions in Lithuania: Perspectives of managers of public and private primary health care institutions’, PloS one, vol. 13, Public Library of Science, no. 12, pp. e0209816–e0209816.
9. David, Sargious, P, Lewanczuk, R, McBrien, K, Tonelli, M, Hemmelgarn, B & Manns, B 2013, ‘Use of chronic disease management programs for diabetes: in Alberta’s primary care networks’, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, vol. 59, College of Family Physicians of Canada, no. 2, pp. e86–e92.
10. Deakin, T, McShane, CE, Cade, JE & Williams, RDRR 2005, ‘Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus’, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, p. CD003417, viewed 22 October 2020, <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15846663/>.
11. DreierWolfgramm, A, Michalowsky, B, Austrom, MG, van, Iliffe, S, Alder, C, Vollmar, Horst Christian, Thyrian, Jochen René, Wucherer, D, Zwingmann, I & Hoffmann, W 2017a, ‘Dementia care management in primary care’, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 68–77.
12. ― 2017b, ‘Dementia care management in primary care’, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 68–77.
13. Foo, Chuan De, Surendran, S, Jimenez, G, Ansah, JP, Matchar, DB & Choon, G 2021, ‘Primary Care Networks and Starfield’s 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management’, International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 18, MDPI, no. 6, p. 2926.
14. Grandes, G, Sanchez, A, Cortada, Josep M, Pombo, H, Martinez, C, Balagué, L, Corrales, MH, Enrique, Mugica, J, Gorostiza, E & PVS group 2017a, ‘Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy: a case study to integrate health promotion in primary and community care’, BMC research notes, vol. 10, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 699–699.
15. ― 2017b, ‘Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy: a case study to integrate health promotion in primary and community care’, BMC research notes, vol. 10, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 699–699.
16. Hsu, J, Price, M, Vogeli, C, Brand, R, Chernew, ME, Chaguturu, Sreekanth K, Weil, E & Ferris, TG 2017, ‘Bending The Spending Curve By Altering Care Delivery Patterns: The Role Of Care Management Within A Pioneer ACO’, Health Affairs, vol. 36, Health Affairs, no. 5, pp. 876–884, viewed 23 June 2021, <https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0922>.
17. Hull, SA, Rajabzadeh, V, Thomas, N, Hoong, S, Dreyer, G, Rainey, H & Ashman, N 2019, ‘Improving coding and primary care management for patients with chronic kidney disease: an observational controlled study in East London’, The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, vol. 69, no. 684, pp. e454–e461, viewed 17 November 2020, <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31160369/>.
18. Khanassov, V, Pluye, P, Descoteaux, S, Haggerty, JL, Russell, G, Gunn, J & Levesque, J 2016a, ‘Organizational interventions improving access to communitybased primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review’, International journal for equity in health, vol. 15, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 168–168.
19. ― 2016b, ‘Organizational interventions improving access to communitybased primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review’, International journal for equity in health, vol. 15, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 168–168.
20. Langton, JM, Wong, ST, Johnston, S, Abelson, J, Ammi, M, Burge, F, Campbell, J, Haggerty, J, Hogg, W, Wodchis, WP & McGrail, K 2016a, ‘Primary Care Performance Measurement and Reporting at a Regional Level: Could a Matrix Approach Provide Actionable Information for Policy Makers and Clinicians?’, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, vol. 12, Longwoods Publishing, no. 2, pp. 33–51.
21. ― 2016b, ‘Primary Care Performance Measurement and Reporting at a Regional Level: Could a Matrix Approach Provide Actionable Information for Policy Makers and Clinicians?’, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, vol. 12, Longwoods Publishing, no. 2, pp. 33–51.
22. Lukewich, J, Corbin, R, VanDenKerkhof, EG, Edge, DS, Williamson, T & Tranmer, JE 2014, ‘Identification, summary and comparison of tools used to measure organizational attributes associated with chronic disease management within primary care settings’, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014/05/20 edn, vol. 20, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, no. 6, pp. 1072–1085.
23. Norris, SL, Lau, J, Smith, SJ, Schmid, CH & Engelgau, MM 2002, ‘Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control’, Diabetes Care, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1159–1171.
24. Pastori, D, Pignatelli, P, Menichelli, D, Violi, F & Lip, GYH 2019a, ‘Integrated Care Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: The ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) Pathway in the ATHEROAF Study Cohort’, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1261–1267.
25. ― 2019b, ‘Integrated Care Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: The ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) Pathway in the ATHEROAF Study Cohort’, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1261–1267.
26. Pendharkar, SR, Blades, K, Kelly, JE, Tsai, WH, Lien, DC, Clement, F, Woiceshyn, J & McBrien, KA 2021, ‘Perspectives on primary care management of obstructive sleep apnea: a qualitative study of patients and health care providers’, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 89–98.
27. Reddy, A, Sessums, L, Gupta, R, Jin, J, Day, T, Finke, B & Bitton, A 2017, ‘Risk Stratification Methods and Provision of Care Management Services in Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative Practices’, Ann Fam Med, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 451.
28. RumballSmith, J, Wodchis, WP, Koné, A, Kenealy, T, Barnsley, J & Ashton, T 2014, ‘Under the same roof: colocation of practitioners within primary care is associated with specialized chronic care management’, BMC family practice, vol. 15, BioMed Central, pp. 149–149.
29. Smith, SM, Cousins, G, Clyne, B, Allwright, S & O’Dowd, T 2017, ‘Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions’, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, no. 2, pp. CD004910–CD004910.
30. Srivastava, A, Kahan, M & Nader, M 2017, ‘Primary care management of opioid use disorders’, Can Fam Physician, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 200.
31. Sturgiss, EA, Elmitt, N, Haesler, E, Weel & Douglas, KA 2018, ‘Role of the family doctor in the management of adults with obesity: a scoping review’, BMJ open, vol. 8, BMJ Publishing Group, no. 2, pp. e019367–e019367.
32. Takeda, A, Martin, N, Taylor, RS & Taylor, SJ 2019, ‘Disease management interventions for heart failure’, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, no. 1, pp. CD002752–CD002752.
33. Thomas, L, Parker, S, Song, H, Gunatillaka, N, Russell, G, Harris, M & IMPACT Team 2019, ‘Health service brokerage to improve primary care access for populations experiencing vulnerability or disadvantage: a systematic review and realist synthesis’, BMC health services research, vol. 19, BioMed Central, no. 1, pp. 269–269.