Human and animal languages

Our spoken language consists of invisible sound waves, so that someone may take the sound flow up and divide it. Just as it is hard to notice and understand the language that is uttered, it also needs excellent engine ability and coordination to generate speech. Language is moreover a social structure, which implies that the object's names are not connected naturally or logically. An animal is called simply a dog, since humans have decided to use the term 'dog' as symbol in the English culture throughout history. Human language is considerably superior to animal communication systems in terms of its complexity, flexibility, and specificity. However, in its basic parts and more advanced cognitive capacities, there are several notable similar characteristics. The language systems common to other animals and exclusive to human beings. The molecular signalling of the production of smells by gestures or sound systems like chirpings of birds, whaling, or bark of pigs from the meadows communicates to each individual animal in some manner. Nevertheless, although many of these modes of communication are clearly complicated, language itself (Grądz, 2018). When we view language as a medium of communication and expression, the study of sounds and gestures must be included (Rugani & Hevia, Dolores, 2017). The issue is immediate: Do they have a language similar to human humans, given that animals make noises and create gestures? Many kinds of animals are clearly interconnected. However, communication between humans and animals differs in seven ways described by linguists:

1) it contains two distinct but interconnected (oral and gestural) grammatic systems; 
2) it always communicates new elements; 
3) it differentiates the content from the form it takes;
4) the speech can be replaced by the hearing;
5) employed for specific reasons (intendancy is expressed behind what is stated);
6) Whether past and future may be what is stated,
7) Children learn adult language; it is passed down via generations.

But recent study has proven that many of these features aren't uniquely human (Grądz, 2018). However, with a certain certainty it can be argued that human language has certain features. Human humans link a few grammatical elements and independent signals to build an endless set of phrases that may not have previously been heard, spoken, read, written or thought. Children who have not yet learned the grammar of their language, use their language skills, as well as stimulus from the language community in which they were born, build their very own norms. Thus, a collection of may be dubbed a language for communication between animals. Thus, a collection of mental activities that can not only produce a "voice" but also "hear" or "understand," is required to allow communication between animals and be dubbed a language. The above assumes that for the birds the capacity to send and decode signals is what allows us to support a discursive language in certain species. In addition to manifesting pain and pleasure states with the sound, according to Pepperberg, (2017)certain birds have the capability to transmit messages in order to trigger the recipient of the message with the appropriate behaviour in the particular circumstances in which they are, for its purpose or purpose. It shows that noises generated by animals are intimately connected with the physiognomic peculiarities of different species indicated in this categorization, which reflected the hylomorphic connection postulated by Aristotle. According to the author, animals that do not make any natural noise can be found on an upward scale. Lung, trachea or larynx of animals belonging to this group are shown to be lacking in species (such as insects and fish), which emit noise, or sound that does not match voice. Thirdly, there are creatures that have a voice, but not a spoken language, with palm or trachea, missing a loose tongue. Little lung, trachea or larynx in animals of such group such as insects and fish show the creatures that create noise (or sound) which do not equate to a voice. Third, there are creatures with a voice but not an articulated language, with lungs or trachea, missing a loose tongue and lips like dolphins and ovipara like snakes or turtles (they whistle they hiss). Finally, there are animal species which communicate in articulated language using voice.

References

Grądz, K. (2018). Animal Language and Human Discourse. Animals and Their People, 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386228_017
Pepperberg, I. M. (2017). Animal language studies: What happened? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.3758/s134230161101y
Rugani, R., & de Hevia, MariaDolores. (2017). Number space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and nonhuman animal species. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.3758/s1342301611262